Research & Fact Checking

#Purpose

Research is the foundation of every publication produced by KBY Technologies.

Before we can explain, analyse or recommend, we must first understand.

This document defines how information is researched, verified and maintained before it is published under the KBY Technologies name.

These standards apply equally to human researchers, editors and artificial intelligence.

---

#Our Research Philosophy

Good knowledge begins with good research.

We do not publish assumptions as facts.

We do not publish rumours as evidence.

We do not publish because information is popular.

We publish because we have sufficient confidence in the accuracy, reliability and usefulness of the information.

Where confidence is limited, we state that openly.

---

#Evidence First

Every significant factual claim should be supported by appropriate evidence.

We prioritise information from:

• Government organisations.
• Official documentation.
• Regulatory bodies.
• Academic institutions.
• Peer-reviewed research.
• Industry standards.
• Original source material.
• Direct evidence where available.

Primary sources should always take priority over secondary reporting whenever practical.

---

#Evaluating Sources

Not all sources carry the same level of authority.

Before relying on a source, consider:

• Who produced it?
• What evidence supports it?
• Is it current?
• Can it be independently verified?
• Does another credible source support the same conclusion?
• Is the source free from obvious bias or commercial influence?

Authority should never be assumed.

It should be demonstrated.

---

#Verification

Before publication, significant factual claims should be verified wherever reasonably possible.

Verification may include:

• Cross-checking multiple authoritative sources.
• Reviewing official documentation.
• Comparing historical information.
• Confirming dates, figures and statistics.
• Testing procedures where practical.
• Consulting subject matter experts where appropriate.

Verification reduces the risk of publishing inaccurate or misleading information.

---

#Distinguishing Fact From Opinion

Readers should always understand whether they are reading:

• Verified facts.
• Analysis based on evidence.
• Expert interpretation.
• Opinion.
• Recommendation.

These should never be presented interchangeably.

Clarity strengthens trust.

---

#Working With Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence can support research by identifying sources, summarising information and highlighting areas for investigation.

AI should never be treated as an authoritative source.

Every factual statement generated or assisted by AI should be independently verified before publication.

Responsibility for verification remains with KBY Technologies.

---

#Updating Published Knowledge

Knowledge changes.

Laws change.

Standards change.

Technology changes.

Published information should be reviewed periodically and updated when significant new evidence becomes available.

Maintaining knowledge is an ongoing editorial responsibility.

---

#When We Should Not Publish

We should delay publication if:

• Evidence is incomplete.
• Claims cannot be verified.
• Sources are unreliable.
• Information conflicts without adequate explanation.
• Important facts remain uncertain.

Publishing later is preferable to publishing inaccurately.

Trust takes priority over speed.

---

#Research Checklist

Before publication, confirm that:

• Reliable sources have been used.
• Significant claims have been verified.
• Evidence supports the conclusions.
• Facts are clearly distinguished from opinion.
• Dates, statistics and quotations have been checked.
• Artificial intelligence output has been reviewed.
• Sources remain current where relevant.

Only then should the publication proceed to editorial review.

---

#In Practice

Before publishing, ask yourself:

• Do we know this, or do we believe it?
• Can every important claim be supported?
• Would another researcher reach the same conclusion?
• Have we used the strongest available evidence?
• Are we being transparent about uncertainty?

If the answer is no, continue researching before publishing.

---

#Related Documents